IIP Procure www. ipprocure.com E-mail:ash@ipprocurement.com Tel: 1-866-387-5386 |
INTRODUCTION TO TRADEMARKS |
WHAT IS A TRADEMARK?
|
|
BENEFIT OF FEDERAL REGISTRATION OF A TRADEMARK
|
A trademark provides two primary rights to the owner of the mark – the right to register the mark, and the right of exclusive use and ownership of the mark for the products or services for which the mark is registered. The right of ownership of a trademark accrues when the mark is first used in commerce. Thus, under common law there is no requirement for the owner of a trademark to register his mark to claim his right to the ownership of the mark. |
However, federal registration of the mark in the U.S. PTO has several benefits. Most companies, businesses and even individuals are aware of this fact and registration of one’s trademark has now become a business necessity to protect the brand of the company’s product or service. In fiscal year 2007, the U.S. PTO received 394,368 trademark applications. |
Some advantages that federal registration of a mark confers on the owner of the mark are:
|
Another rationale for growth in registration may be attributed to the globalization and growth of multinational companies, simply because registration in one country may be used as the basis for registration in other countries. A company that wishes to export internationally may accidentally infringe the rights of other trademark owners in foreign countries unless their mark has been previously registered in that country. |
International registration of marks may be obtained under the Madrid System of International Registration of Marks through the World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. An international application for a trademark under the Madrid System needs to be based upon a previously filed application or registered trademark in the national patent office through which the international application is filed. |
Filing an international application under the Madrid System (also referred to as the Madrid Protocol) allows registration and protection of the mark in several countries by the filing of one international application under the Madrid Protocol, thereby reducing the time consuming procedure of filing national applications for the mark in each country where the applicant wishes to register the mark. An international filing of the mark under the Madrid Protocol allows the owner of the mark to make changes to the application, pay filing and other fees and renew the application through one agency instead of following cumbersome administrative procedures in each country that the applicant selects for registration of the mark. |
The increase in registration of marks may also be explained by the fact that unregistered marks are inherently at risk. Apart from the obvious reason that the mark may be used by another person for similar goods and services leading to consumer confusion, there is the likelihood of the same person registering the mark before the original mark is registered. |
In addition, a trademark owner now has the responsibility to register his mark in order to protect it from potential infringers. |
PROPER USE OF TRADEMARKS
|
Improper use of trademarks may result in loss of trademark rights granted by federal registration of the mark. Prior to registration of a mark, the owner should use the notation TM after the product, for example Ryan Blankets™, or the symbol SM after a service, for example Pet Grooming ?. After the mark is federally registered, the owner should mark the product with the ® symbol, for example Coca-Cola®, or otherwise indicate that the mark is federally registered, for example, insert the following after the name of the goods or service “Fed. Reg. TM, ”. |
Use of the word trademark as a substitute for the goods or service they identify may result in loss of trademark rights. To preclude such loss, the goods or services that the trademark identifies must be entered, immediately after the trademark. For example, if the trademark Acro identifies a brand of soccer shoes, the phrase “Acro® shoes” must be used when the Acro® mark is used to avoid the Acro® mark from becoming generic and synonymous with soccer shoes. Several registered trademark products, for example “aspirin”, “cellophane”, etc., have lost their trademark rights as the trademark has become generic and is now associated with the class of the trademarked product, in this case with an analgesic and transparent tape, respectively. |
PRINCIPAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
|
The U.S. PTO maintains two types of registers for trademarks – the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register. The marks registered on the Principal Register are primarily marks that have been allowed by the U.S. PTO examiner as unique, non-descriptive and not likely to be confused with prior registered marks. Such marks enjoy several benefits such as constructive notice of the registrant’s claim to the ownership of the mark , the right to incontestability after five years of continued use, the exclusive right of the owner to use the mark in commerce in connection with the goods and services, etc. |
Marks considered descriptive of the product by the U.S. PTO examiner that are refused registration on the Principal Register may be registered on the Supplemental Register for a period of 5 years to acquire “secondary meaning”. The mark may then be transferred by the applicant to the Principal Register when it is deemed to have become distinctive. The advantage of registration on the Supplemental Register is that the owner will be able to preclude others from registration of the mark in connection with similar goods and services. Also, registration of the mark on the Supplemental Register allows the owner to mark his product or service with the ® symbol, file a foreign application and file an infringement suit in a Federal Court. |
TRADEMARK LAW IN THE UNITED STATES
|
U.S. trademark law was initially based on common law, more precisely the law of unfair competition. It was not until 1881 that Congress drafted an act under the Commerce Clause that unified the existing law under a federal statute which was further revised in 1905. At present, the law of trademark registration and procedure is codified in the Lanham Act, enacted by Congress in 1946. |
The Lanham Act codifies provisions for registration of trademarks on the Principal Register and the Supplemental Register, trademark infringement, false advertising and trademark dilution. The more recent and updated version of the Act also includes a chapter on the Madrid Protocol and international filing of a trademark. |
Appeals taken from a trademark application and other related issues are heard by the Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the U.S. PTO. The TTAB hears and decides cases on trademark opposition and appeals regarding decisions of the trademark examiner’s refusal to register a mark. The TTAB Manual of Procedure is a good guide for those who wish to file an appeal with the TTAB. The decision of the TTAB may be appealed to the United States District Court, or to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
|